Login

Please login for an individual price calculation.

Forgot Password?

Always stay up to date

With our e-mailings you will receive regular information about products, events, services and Balluff.

REGISTER AS A COMPANY

We will check whether you already have a customer number with us in order to link your new online account with it.

Register
Products
Service & Support
Industries & Solutions
Company

Who Moved My Data? Part 2: Insourcing Condition Monitoring

Exploring the benefits, challenges, and strategic value of bringing condition monitoring in-house

Shishir Rege
12 Aug 2025 | 15:46 Clock

Reading Time: minutes

In my previous blog on this topic, “Who Moved My Data? Outsourcing Condition Monitoring,” I established the case for condition-based monitoring of critical assets to ensure a reduction in unplanned downtime. I also explored the advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing condition monitoring from critical assets. Here I discuss the do-it-yourself (DIY) approach to condition monitoring and explore its advantages and disadvantages.

Understanding the DIY approach

Now, let me be clear to avoid any confusion, when I refer to “do it yourself,” I don’t mean literally doing it yourself. Instead, this is something you own and customize to fit your applications. It may require a fair amount of input from your maintenance teams and plants. It’s not a one-day job, of course, but an ongoing initiative to help improve productivity and have continuous improvements throughout the plant.

Advantages and disadvantages of DIY condition monitoring (insourcing)

Implementing the solutions for continuous condition monitoring of critical assets by yourself has many advantages, along with some disadvantages. Let’s review them.

Advantages of insourcing (DIY) condition monitoring

  1. Data ownership: One of the greatest benefits or advantages of implementing the DIY approach to condition monitoring is the control it gives you over data. You decide where the data lives, how it is used, and who has access to it. As I emphasized in my previous blog and numerous presentations on this topic, “Data is king” – a highly valuable commodity.

  2. Flexibility and customization: Of course, the DIY solution is not a one-size-fits-all approach! Instead, it allows you to customize the solution to fit your exact needs – the parameters to monitor, the specific areas of the plant to focus on the critical systems and the method of monitoring. You choose how to implement the solutions to fit your plant’s budget.

  3. Low long-term costs: As you own the installations, you own the data and you own the equipment; you don’t need to pay rent for the systems implemented through outsourcing.

  4. The specification advantage: As a plant or company, you can add condition monitoring features as specifications for your next generation of machines and equipment, including specific protocols or components. This allows you to collect the required data from the machine or equipment from the get-go.

    1. High upfront cost: Implementing condition monitoring with a data collection system may involve higher upfront costs. This is because there is a need to invest in data storage solutions, engage experts for condition monitoring implementation (typically from an integration house or through self-integration), and employ developers to create or customize dashboards to fit user needs.

    2. Limited scalability: collecting more data requires additional storage and enhanced analytics capabilities, especially when transitioning from condition-based maintenance to predictive analytics. Designing your own solution with limited budgets may hamper the scalability of the overall system.

    3. Infrastructure maintenance: This is another area that requires close attention. Whether the infrastructure is located on-premises, centralized, or in the cloud, the chosen location may require investments in manpower for ongoing maintenance.

Another point to emphasize here is that opting for a DIY solution does not preclude the use of cloud platforms for data management and data storage. The difference between insourcing and outsourcing lies in the implementation of condition monitoring and related analytics – whether it’s carried out and owned by you or by someone else.

Strategic decision-making: beyond cost considerations

The final point is not to make outsourcing decisions solely based on cost. Condition-based monitoring and the future of analytics offer numerous advantages, and nurturing an in-house culture could be a great source of competitive advantage for the organization. You can always start small and progressively expand.

As always, your feedback is welcome.

 

Did you like this post?

0

Share this post

Author

Shishir Rege

Shishir Rege


13 Contributions

Comment

More from the author

Energy consumption labeling
Energy consumption labeling

EPREL - European Product Database for Energy Labeling

Do you have any questions or suggestions? We are at your disposal.

For all questions concerning commercial topics such as quotations, orders, and delivery times, our inside sales department will be happy to support you: [email protected]

For Aftersales, Technical Support, Applications and
Product Inquiries we will be happy to support you: [email protected]

Feel free to contact us directly by telephone:

Inside Sales 859-727-2200 - press 1
Presales Tech Support 859-727-2200 - press 2
Aftersales Tech Support 859-727-2200 - press 3


Balluff Inc.

8125 Holton Dr.
Florence, KY 41042

Free sample product

In order to add a free sample product to the cart we will need to remove all the normal products from the cart. Are you sure you want to continue