When to Modify Sensors vs. Using Standard Off the Shelf Products
Optimize performance, cost, and timelines with the right sensor strategy
Reading Time: minutes
In modern industrial automation, sensors play a critical role in collecting reliable data and ensuring stable, efficient operation. But selecting the right sensor isn’t always straightforward. Teams often face a familiar question:
Do we modify a standard sensor to fit our application, or do we redesign the application around an off the shelf product?
Understanding when to choose each path helps reduce costs, minimize lead times, and improve long-term maintainability.
The Case for Standard Off the Shelf Sensors
Off the shelf sensors remain the default choice for most applications—and with good reason. They are:
1. Cost-Effective
Mass-produced sensors benefit from economies of scale. Unless you require a very niche feature, standard units almost always cost significantly less than custom modifications.
2. Readily Available
Lead times are shorter, vendor support is standardized, and documentation is complete. This makes maintenance, stocking, and future replacements straightforward.
3. Fully Tested and Certified
Most industries (manufacturing, automotive, food & beverage, etc.) rely heavily on already-certified sensors. When compliance—UL, CE, ATEX, etc.—matters, off the shelf is the path of least resistance.
4. Supported Across OEM Platforms
PLC I/O, industrial protocols, bracket designs, and mounting standards are often developed around common sensor families. Using these avoids integration surprises.
Best for:
Applications with standard geometries, environmental conditions, sensing ranges, or electrical requirements.
When Modifying a Sensor Makes Sense
Sometimes even the best standard products fall short. That’s when modifying a sensor becomes the smarter long-term choice—despite the added cost.
1. When the Application Has Unique Geometry Constraints
If mounting space is especially tight or the sensing target is unusually shaped, a modified housing, cable exit, or connector orientation might be necessary.
Common examples:
Custom angled housings to fit inside compact machine frames
Narrow-beam optics to detect small features
Connector repositioning to avoid cable strain
2. When Environmental Conditions Exceed Standard Ratings
Harsh environments often demand more robust sensor builds:
Extreme heat beyond standard operating temperatures
Chemical exposure requiring upgraded housings or seals
High vibration environments where potting or reinforced connectors are essential
Modifying the sensor may prevent chronic failures—and the downtime that follows.
3. When Your Data Requirements Are Specialized
Some processes require:
Unique output curves
Uncommon analog ranges
Calibrations tied to specific materials or distances
In these cases, the sensor isn’t just detecting—it’s measuring in a highly specific way. That often warrants modification.
4. When Integration Needs Demand Customization
Custom cable lengths, molded connectors, or special communication formats reduce complexity on the machine side. While these are small tweaks, they can improve reliability and installation time.
Cost, Lead Time, and Risk: How to Decide
Here’s a simple decision framework to help guide the choice:
Choose Off the Shelf When:
The sensor meets 80–90% of requirements
Small application changes can absorb the difference
Long-term maintenance simplicity is important
You want predictable lead times and pricing
Choose a Modified Sensor When:
The application cannot be changed or optimized
Standard sensors would require workarounds that introduce risk
The sensing requirement is mission critical and failures are costly
You need custom calibration or environmental durability
A Practical Middle Path: Application Optimization
Before modifying a sensor, consider whether small changes in mechanical design or adjustments to process parameters can allow use of a standard product. This balance often yields:
Lower cost
Faster deployment
Better long-term maintainability
As a project manager or engineer, it’s our role to assess whether modifying the sensor or modifying the application is more efficient in the long run.
Making the Right Choice
Both customized and off the shelf sensors have their place. The smartest choice comes from understanding your application's constraints, environmental demands, and long-term maintenance strategy.
By approaching sensor selection with a structured decision-making process, teams can reduce costs, increase reliability, and streamline future upgrades or replacements.
Keywords
- RFID
- Industry 4.0
- Sensor technology
- Basics of automation
- Industrial automation
- Technology trends
- Smart sensor technology
- Connectivity
- Life Science
- Capacitive sensing
- Photoelectric sensing
- Predictive maintenance
- Object detection
- Harsh environments
- Welding
- Flow measurement
- Machine vision
- Intralogistics
- Semiconductors
- Inductive sensors
Author
Shawn Day
Shawn Day has more than 25 years of manufacturing automation experience, including fifteen years at Balluff, Inc., where he serves as a technical engineer specializing in object detection related to high-speed automation, welding and stamping fabrication. He emphasizes the prevention of decreasing sensor-related machine downtime and increasing productivity. Prior to joining Balluff, Shawn worked for a Tier One automotive supplier for 15 years where he gained a vast knowledge of high-speed factory automation, with a proven record of increasing machine cycle times.
6 Contributions
Comment
Popular posts
Industrial sensing fundamentals – NPN vs PNP
What is a capacitive sensor?
How do I wire my 3-wire sensors?
The basic operating principle of an inductive proximity sensor
Contact form
Do you have any questions or suggestions? We are at your disposal.
Balluff Inc.
-
8125 Holton Dr.
Florence, KY 41042